written report of field observation research skate park observation project who skateboarding more

This simulation research report will draw on the work i have done on the field, in this case which would be the skate park that is located in San Diego downtown, the Washington street skate park and two other skate parks, Belvedere park skatepark and chicano park skatepark as supplementary. In the report you will discuss your research question(s), related scholarly readings(which i will provide), your research methods, and your findings. This report will hold no specific academic purposes rather than a writing assignment, you will not be evaluated on the reality of your finding, so all related figures, characters, or findings could be fiction, but the description of the parks themselves need to be realistic because they are real locations use gallery to easily figure it out. The only things matter would be the research questions and the method that to approach and the way how you put those together with related scholarly readings. I will also provide a sample to show how it should be done. The main research question is related to gender, specific questions would be: how skateboarding associates with gender and how different gender behave differently in skate park? What is the relationship between different gender in skateboarding activities? and so on. All questions that are listed here(but not limited to) need to be answered. The report should includes sub-questions that under the main topic ” who skateboarding more”, such as questions that about race and ethnic groups that associate among three skate parks. I also will include my field journal to help you figure out what is going on, but plz use your imagination.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

assessing dividend policy 1

Revisit the company you chose for your Week Six Final Project Walt Disney. Using the annual report and other sources such as a 10k or 10q’s, discuss the dividend policy of your company.

Answer the following questions as part of your response:

  • How would you describe your chosen company’s dividend policy?
  • Why do you believe this company chose the dividend policy they have in place?
  • Do you agree or disagree that they have selected the best dividend policy for the company?
  • How might this dividend policy function in both perfect and imperfect capital markets?
  • Calculate the dividend rate over the past 5 years. Define why you believe that it has or has not changed over the last 5 years.

Support your position with evidence from the text or external sources.
Your post should be 200-250 words in length.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

week 1 economics questions problems

Please complete the week-1 textbook exercises referenced below. I do not have the textbook material so research will be required in order to complete these assignments. Login into the Moodle/Dashboard & review the week-1 slides & videos to obtain an understanding.

Submit the assignment to me on Studypool by Monday, 3/5/18 at 6:00 p.m.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

frankenstein critical analysis evaluation essay 1

Note: Please review the source guidelines below very carefully. If you do not choose from the provided sources below, this will cause a grading delay and you will need to resubmit the assignment. For this assignment you will write your evaluation essay.

Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment.

First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique.

Choose from among these sources: 

ipl2 Literary Criticism collection: If you use this site, you must choose from the first seven critiques listed as the final two are notscholarly: (http://www.ipl.org/div/litcrit/bin/litcrit.out.pl?… 

Professor Sherry Ginn’s critique:1http://www.clas.ufl.edu/ipsa/2003/ginn.html

 Professor Naomi Hetherington’s critique: http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/hether.htm…

The questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down!

Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:

1. Evaluate the critic/author:

Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have (education, professional career, other publications, etc.)? (If you are using a credible author, you should be able to find her/his credentials fairly easily)

2. Find the thesis of the article:

What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?

3. Evaluate the thesis:

Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisitingthe same ones the critics have chosen.

4. Evaluate the support:

Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?

Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classification, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critic’s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essay’s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the first critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis.

For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the first critic’s thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue you own view of the first critic’s thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical–if that’s the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critic’s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics.

In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims are supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen,the novel, Frankenstein, and/or the study guides. Using proper MLA 2 style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.

Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein?

You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement:

(Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support).

OR

(Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support).

More specific thesis examples:

John Smith uses “Frankenstein Critique Essay” to adequately argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster by coddling Victor as a boy.

OR

John Smith’s “Frankenstein Critique Essay” does not effectively argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible.

The guidelines for this assignment are as follows:

Length:

This assignment should be at least 750 words.

Header:

Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information: Your first and last name Course Title (Composition II) Assignment name (Evaluation Essay) Current Date

Format:

MLA-style source documentation and Works Cited 3 Your last name and page number in the upper-right corner of each page Double-spacing throughout Standard font (TimesNewRoman, Calibri) Title, centered after heading 1” margins on all sides

Save the file using one of the following extensions: .docx, .doc, .rtf, or .txt

Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph.

Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.

3 This resource may be helpful as you are making MLA formatting decisions: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01…

2 Tip: Review the course topics for MLA resources. Failure to use MLA style will result in a reduced grade

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

i need help on this essay 1

The Final Research Paper should demonstrate understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research, as well as the implications of new knowledge.

You will analyze the ethical implications and homeland security implications on one of the following five topics:

  • Racial profiling in the war on terrorism.
  • Water-boarding and other coercive tactics of interrogation on detained terrorist suspects.
  • The PATRIOT Act in regards to its authorization of surveillance and search and seizure.
  • The invasion of Iraq in regards to the use of preventive/pre-emptive war.
  • The use of military tribunals in adjudicating the guilt or innocence of known or suspected terrorists.

At minimum, the paper should accomplish the following:

  • Analyze the ethical implications on the chosen topic.
  • Analyze the ethical implications from the official Government perspective of Homeland Security.
  • Analyze the topic, drawing on the stated ethical and homeland security implications, justifying/not justifying its use through the Just War Theory (this should be as objective as possible—it is not an opinion piece).
  • Present final conclusions based on the analysis of the chosen topic from various perspectives and the tenant of Just War Theory.

You must inform the instructor of your paper topic by Day 7 of Week One. The paper is due in Week Five.

Writing the Final Research Paper
The Final Research Paper:

  • Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
  • Demonstrate the ability to think and analyze critically while writing a college-level research paper using APA style.
  • Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
  • Must use at least three assigned sources, and five additional sources found through outside research using the Ashford University Library.
  • Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

given the nature of the sourcing challenges at two roads describe and critique their approach to strategic sourcing

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

leadership from theory to practice and self reflection 1

This is a Work Integrated Learning (WIL) assessment task that allows students to apply their knowledge and skills into practical situations. It is assessed through a real workplace context where feedback from industry is integral to students’ experience. This assessment is designed to lead you from critical analysis of your role model to reflect on how you can improve your own leadership qualities and effectiveness through three learning stages: a) Observation; b) Feedback; and c) Self-reflection.

The first stage is to select a person whom you consider to be a successful and effective leader. This person could be someone you work with or for, or with whom you have the opportunity to interact. Then, through your observation, you will identify the person’s leadership traits and behaviours. The learning outcome of this stage is that you are challenged to apply the theories in this course with your observation.

For the second stage, you are asked to get feedback from the person who has served as your role model in the first stage. In this stage, you are expected to learn not only from your role model’s experience but also about the complexities of leadership. You will also get feedback from your role model on your findings from Stage One.

In the final stage, Self reflection and Recommendation, you are asked to reflect on your own leadership, based on what you learnt the observation and feedback from your role model, and consider how your own leadership qualities could be improved. By going through these three stages, you should be able to critically analyse and evaluate leadership theories and practices and understand how to improve your own leadership effectiveness and qualities.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

study question help

  1. What beautiful Lady of Grace arrived from Paradise (“the place I am longing to return to”) to ask assistance for Dante’s journey?
    Beatrice
    Rachel
    The Virgin Mary
    Lucia (St. Lucy)

QUESTION 2

  1. What teacher/poet was born “sub Julio,” during the reign of Julius Ceasar?
    Aeneas
    Virgil
    Paul
    Dante

QUESTION 3

  1. When Dante speaks to Francesca and Paolo, who “[leave] the flock where Dido is” to talk to him, what do they tell him about love?
    Love is dangerous, and led them straight to sudden death together
    Love and the memory of love is the only thing that keeps life in Hell bearable
    To follow the commandment to Love One Another is the only hope for a poor soul’s salvation
    Dante must keep the image of his One True Love firmly in mind, in order to escape the terror of Hell

QUESTION 4

  1. What is the last line of the words inscribed on a ledge above the gate to Hell?
    Abandon Every Hope, All You Who Enter
    Repent Before It Is Too Late
    This Way to Hell
    Dulce et Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori

QUESTION 5

  1. TRUE or FALSE: Dante sees Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle in Hell





QUESTION 6

  1. Before the pilgrim, Dante, shows up–has anyone in Hell ever been able to leave and “go to bliss?”
    Only a few — Adam, Noah, David, Moses, and very few others.
    Nobody. Ever. Seriously.
    Many people — those who serve out their punishments for their earthly wrong-doings can have, after centuries, moved on to Purgatory, to work their way toward Salvation.

QUESTION 7

  1. TRUE OR FALSE: Dante sees Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and Sappho in Hell





QUESTION 8

  1. What feature stands out most about Charon, the old Ferryman?
    His weeping (“tongue confused, a language strained in anguish”)
    His wounds (“made their faces run with blood in streaks”)
    His eyes (“glowing coals” / “glowing wheels of fire”)
    His transparency (“one grown faint / perhaps of too much silence”)

QUESTION 9

  1. TRUE OR FALSE: Dante sees Homer, Ovid, and Horace in Hell.





QUESTION 10

  1. TRUE OR FALSE: Dante sees Cleopatra, Tristan, and Helen of Troy in Hell





 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

grant proposal 3

1000-1500 WORDS

  • Address the following, and add your responses to your Key Assignment Final Draft:
    • Continuing with the grant proposal that you outlined in Week 4, research funding sources for your proposal.
    • Searching the Internet, including private, local, state, and federal Web sites, locate at least 3 grant opportunities that might be pursued for your grant proposal.
    • Provide a brief overview of each funding opportunity and how your grant proposal relates to the opportunity.
    • In addition to the overview, you should rank the 3 grant opportunities based on what makes the most sense for your agency.
    • Lastly, in Week 3, you gave a detailed description of at least 4 of the elements in a grant proposal.
    • You are now to complete those 4 sections of the grant proposal based on your outline
  • Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

PLEASE SEE WEEK 4 AND WEEK 3 ATTACHED IN ORDER AS STATED

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

philosophy paper 11

Please follow all requirement, and write a 1.5 pages paper. Need read my book ( picture). Due US pacific time, 3/14.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.